site stats

Mcclung v doosan babcock ltd and others

WebIn the case of Mr E McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd and others, an ardent supporter of Glasgow Rangers Football Club [“Rangers FC”] claimed that his support for the club was a philosophical belief.He thus felt it should be recognised as a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010. This was rejected by the Employment Tribunal. Web17 feb. 2024 · Published. 17 February 2024. Country: Scotland. Jurisdiction code: Unfair Dismissal. Decision date: 26 August 2024. Read the full decision in Mr W Ross v …

Catherine D. on LinkedIn: Mr E McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd and others ...

Web6 sep. 2024 · Edward McClung, 51, sued construction firm Doosan Babcock and recruitment agency NRL for £80,000 - insisting he was discriminated against when he lost work, as he is a diehard fan of Rangers... Web27 okt. 2024 · Read the full decision in Mr E McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd and others: 4110538/2024 - Preliminary. Published 27 October 2024 Last updated 5 September … timewell jefferson wi https://ayscas.net

Mr W Ross v Doosan Babcock Ltd: 4107603/2024 - GOV.UK

Web22 sep. 2024 · An employee’s support of a football club did not amount to a protected philosophical belief within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010. Case: McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd and others 2024 Mr McClung had supported Rangers Football Club (Rangers) for 42 years, was a member of the club and received annual birthday cards … Web21 mrt. 2024 · This is why I love my job - there is something new every day including this Scottish case which found that supporting Rangers did not amount to a protected … Webthrough his personal services company, McClung Strategy and Projects Ltd, 15 and was neither an employee of the second respondent or the first respondent. Third Respondent … parker\\u0027s filling station mcgehee ar

Employment Case Law Update September 2024 DavidsonMorris

Category:Football is religion, or is it? - sportlawmusings.com

Tags:Mcclung v doosan babcock ltd and others

Mcclung v doosan babcock ltd and others

Contractor Argued His Support for Glasgow Rangers Football Club ...

WebThis is why I love my job - there is something new every day including this Scottish case which found that supporting Rangers did not amount to a protected... WebThis promises to be an interesting first instance decision as to whether being a passionate supporter of a football club (Rangers in this case) is enough to…

Mcclung v doosan babcock ltd and others

Did you know?

Web10 sep. 2024 · Mr E McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd and others (Scotland : Religion or Belief Discrimination) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) 5 Case No: … WebThis is why I love my job - there is something new every day including this Scottish case which found that supporting Rangers did not amount to a protected...

Web5 sep. 2024 · Mr E McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd and others: 4110538/2024. Mr E McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd and others: 4110538/2024 Local copy of Mr_E_McClung_v_Doosan_Babcock_Ltd ... Web16 nov. 2024 · The ET in McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd held that the claimant’s lifelong support for a football club (in this case, Glasgow Rangers) was not a protected philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010. Therefore, Mr McClung could not bring claims for discrimination or harassment on this basis. This result is positive for employers, …

Web30 sep. 2024 · The McClung v Doosan Babcock case demonstrates that a discrimination claim can be raised about issues that aren't even explicitly related to a protected … WebMcClung v Doosan Babcock; McClung v Doosan Babcock. Filters. Summary. The Employment Tribunal has ruled that support for a football club (in this case, Rangers) is not tantamount to a religious or philosophical belief, ... Croner-i Limited 240 Blackfriars Road London SE1 8NW United Kingdom.

Web28 okt. 2024 · Mr McClung is self-employed through his company McClung Strategy and Projects Ltd and carried out work for energy construction firm Doosan Babcock via recruiters NRL from January to June in 2024.

WebMr E McClung Claimant In Person Doosan Babcock Ltd First Respondent Represented by: Ms L Miller - Solicitor NRL Ltd Second Respondent Represented by: Mr D Livingston … time wellnessWebThe Law. Section 104 (1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 specifies that an employee can claim automatic unfair dismissal (ie no qualifying service needed) if the reason or … parker\u0027s elbow room manitowocWebAn interesting Employment Tribunal case this week has ruled that supporting a football team was not a philosophical belief. In the Glasgow tribunal… time wellness atlanta