Webquestion whether damage is too remote to ground an action, because in the former case the test is stricter. The engineers of the Wagon Mound were careless in taking furnace oil aboard in Sydney Harbour. Much oil escaped onto the water, drifted some distance to a wharf where it was accidentally ignited by someone else, and caused WebThe Wagon Mound No 1 Test for remoteness of damage: Damage must be of a kind which is foreseeable - once this is established D will be liable for the full extent of the damage even if the extent of the damage is not foreseeable.

Remoteness Practical Law

WebTo gain access to the page you requested, you will need to purchase the course materials or use a promotion code. If you need to purchase the course materials, please visit the … WebThis case, Overseas Tankship v Morts Dock, more commonly known as "The Wagon Mound" occurred when an unlikely series of events followed an initial act of neg... diming 3pt shooter

Legal Concept of Remoteness the Tort Negligence

WebOil leaked from the Wagon Mound but D’s employees let it spread as they thought that the risk of it catching fire on the water was remote. When the oil caught fire, C’s wharf (Mort’s … WebWagon Mound refers to a number of subjects: Wagon Mound National Historic Landmark, a butte and camp near town of Wagon Mound, New Mexico Wagon Mound, New Mexico, the town Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and … http://lawschool.mikeshecket.com/torts/10-28-03.htm dim in as long